Archive for the ‘management leadership’ Category

LEADING AND MANAGING CULTURAL ISSUES AT WORK

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

As leaders we need to facilitate formal individual and structured interdepartmental interactions to provide different sub-cultures, which all organizations have, with a forum to learn of each other’s frustrations, priorities and core values. Interdepartmental teams formed to work together to develop interface understanding and solutions to cultural difficulties and opposing work priorities can be a great help. Also as the leader we must passionately discourage any behaviour that allows departments to blame each other for difficulties and insist that ‘collaborating on solutions’ is the only cultural norm that will be tolerated.

‘Cultural differences’ are not just a ‘locals’ and ‘expats’ or say an ‘Asian’ versus ‘Western’ problem; they are also a potentially destructive force between workgroups that have opposing ‘work-culture’ priorities and perspectives within the same organization.

As a priority all staff need to develop some overall ‘Business Competence’ and be encouraged to see their role as it relates to the ‘entire organization’ rather than see themselves as ‘a member of a department’ or as an individual that just swaps a narrowly focussed service based or a specific expertise for money. Individuals must develop ‘a customer orientation’, ‘industry knowledge’, ‘an entrepreneurial attitude’, ‘an operational development focus’, ‘sound company knowledge’ and particularly understand the ‘overall company financial result’ and the part they play in it.

Modern business complexity and customer demands mean modern organizations are more solutions driven than product driven. This complexity means more efforts are need to be undertaken by project teams made up of individuals from different functional backgrounds. Employees must buy into the idea that they must be able to switch rapidly from one task to another, to work with people with very different vocational training and mind-sets. Working in situations in which ‘the team’ is the responsible party, the manager only a coordinator, where all parties no longer have clear job descriptions and where all are required to work on several projects at the same time is today’s cultural norm.

Now you may not initially think this is a great problem however, imagine a meeting between R&D, who are interested in ‘long term visions, superior features, safety, the best product for the customer’ and the finance division who are interested in ‘cost minimization, immediate cash flow, long term profitability and the shareholders’. Add a representative of the sales department, ‘market share, need it now, the price has to be more competitive’ and perhaps a HR director, ‘they’re not trained, it’s too much of a stain on the staff and they’ll all leave’ and cultural issues will explode.

As leader/managers with an ever increasing mix of people from different backgrounds combined with ever increasing rates of change and the need for greater levels of specialisation, we all need to spend more time managing the cultural differences in our organisations. “It’s their fault,” is often heard in organizations where there is no individual or interdepartmental understanding. This divisiveness left unresolved will cause poor work relationships, lousy business interactions and will always translate into poor customer service.

YES YES THAT’S MY PLACE… WHAT DO I DO?

Read the next blog post coming soon!

Direct page viewers can go to main blog to check out other posts by clicking on the white “orglearn.org” in the header panel above!

Suffering in your career from a lousy culture or cultural management practices at work? Time to move on? Update your personal brand using the free blank resume form! Buy the way there are lots of career articles at orglearn management and career success!

WHAT DO MANAGERS DO AND DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE A MANAGER?

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Many individuals I train are making the move from technical expertise (engineers) to becoming mangers where their technical powerbase will be less relevant. This involves a large amount of retraining and education and for some it’s a very daunting decision.

So what do managers do and what are the pros and cons of taking a management role?

According to Peter Drucker managers:

• Set objectives.
• Organize.
• Motivate and communicate.
• Measure.
• Develop people.

Well then of course there’s the old tried and true, planning, organizing, acting controlling and leader roles managers are expected to undertake to be at least efficient let alone effective. As the need to be a leader/manager is the most prevalent role definition today we all need to be:

• sellers of the vision
• strong advocates for the mission
• implementers of the plan

Of course all this needs to be achieved whilst coming to grips with the mindless vagaries of indolent self centred staff, or worse trying to maintain control the excesses of the exuberant ‘don’t know what they don’t know’ bunch to ensure they don’t give away the profits.

To make things more complicated for those working in cross-cultural situations you have the frustration of… “EMPOWERMENT” no thanks just tell me what to do you’re the boss… or you want ME to take RESPONSIBILITY, or again ‘no thanks that’s too scary ANYWAY IT’S NEVER MY FAULT’.

Assuming we are good at the technical, human, conceptual/evaluative and cultural parts of our traditional management role how can we ensure we breakthrough the pack of average and/or even effective managers and become a SUCCESSFUL manager. When I say successful I mean how fast we are promoted through our organisation.

Two issues are critical. Firstly, if you look around any organisation it doesn’t take long to realise that successful people don’t get paid because they work hard (although most do), they get paid for taking responsibility, that’s where the money is, in being prepared to take responsibility for outcomes and selling our organization on our competence and willingness do what has to be done.

Secondly, a study some years ago conducted by “Luthans, Hodgetts & Rosenkrantz” on Effective v’s Successful managers shows (amongst other things) the interesting statistic that successful managers spend 48% of their time ‘networking’, while average managers spend 19% and effective managers spend 11%. So socialising & politicking and forming bonds of trust both inside and outside our organization will have a profound effect on our trip up (or down) the proverbial ‘greasy pole’.

‘IT’S HARD TO REMEMBER YOUR TASK WAS TO DRAIN THE SWAMP WHEN YOU’RE UP TO YOUR BACKSIDE IN CROCODILES’ (author unknown)

SO WHY BE A MANAGER AND WHAT DO YOU GET?

Status, Power, Monetary Rewards, Personal Satisfaction

WHAT ABOUT THE DOWNSIDE?

Loneliness, often no immediate feedback, the burden of responsibility for outcomes, lack of control as you need to rely on others, someone is always looking to take your position, an increased need for political savvy and sometimes onerous legal responsibilities and regulatory restrictions.

If you would like to read more about management and what’s involved here is the link for direct page viewers return to main blog pagecareer success to check out other posts!

If you are looking to move into a management position you may (will) need to update your resume with the appropriate management skills listed so take a look at the free blank resume form!

Finally before you decide to take on a management role best think long and hard about what you want for your career and the costs your striving for ‘success’ may bring.

Survey Finds Strong Leadership Still Lacking in the Workplace

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

With sound and effective leadership in today’s economic climate more important than ever I am astounded that I still read survey results such as the one below.

‘Jan. 26 2010 PRNewswire/ — According to a recent national survey by Lee Hecht Harrison, the majority of workers in the U.S. find their bosses likeable, but feel the management within their companies have room for improvement.’

Well that’s a “no brainer” of course and I guess it will always be the case however their next statement gives a little more insight.

“When asked to rank which qualities their boss best exhibited, likability took the top spot among U.S. workers, followed by leadership, honesty, fairness, patience and loyalty. Although leadership ranked second, just less than half of workers polled (49%) thought their managers exhibited strong leadership skills – a sobering data point reinforcing the need for renewed focus on leadership development.”

I have seen in many countries the problem of bosses wanting to be liked. To be honest if you are an individual that needs to be liked can I suggest you don’t take on a leadership role. You don’t want to be hated either however you must be respected if you are wanting to be an effective leader.

There are many aspects of to gaining respect however here is a short checklist.

Openness: let people know what you want from them and how you feel about their efforts

Competence: if you can’t demonstrate that you are a competent person you will never gain committed followers

Consistency: a measured and stable attitude to work and followers is essential if you are to reduce unwarranted levels tension and promote excellence

According to the website Bizcovering [and I agree] you also need to ‘Show courage in facing difficult issues even admitting own mistakes, maintain your vision consistently and involve everyone positively’. They go on to say a “most importantly. you need some mechanism for sustaining hope when things otherwise look sour.”

Another key survey finding uncovered: “Motivation & Mentorship Lagging: Only 24% of employees polled felt that their manager displayed motivational skills [I think they mean inspirational skill as I have explained in another blog post] and the same number noted that their supervisor failed to mentor and explain the choices made from an organizational perspective.”

**Link for direct page viewers return to main blog if you would like to read other blog posts on career and leadership success!

If you are looking to work for a more effective leader and need a change of jobs/employers take a look at the free blank resume form!

Finally can I suggest that again the central problem is poor communication skills. I have written many posts on the need to communicate well as a manger, the difficulties most of us have and some of the solutions available. Can I also strongly suggest that if you are a manger and not currently reading (or have never read) a book on leadership and/or leadership communication, best visit your local bookstore as soon as possible.

NINE STEPS FOR SETTING UP A LEARNING ORGANIZATION

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

With the recent economic troubles a learning organization is a must for a successful future.

The following nine points are an adapted from an old however very good, must buy book – Mitch McCrimmon’s – ‘Unleash the Entrepreneur Within’

Remembering that the only way to improve is to learn and the only proof of learning is a change in behavior, how can we create organizations that learn and more importantly change?

1. Budget, time, money and manpower to achieve both individual and organizational learning – ensure management and ALL employees see learning as a ‘real target’ and set up mechanisms to ensure accountability and to measure results. Many organizations seem to talk about being learning organizations however if it isn’t budgeted for, invested in and measured it is just a farce. Each manager needs to have learning and knowledge retention listed in their key responsibility areas and be assessed on their performance in this area at performance appraisal time.

2. Identify strategic learning areas for your business and where new products or product innovations are likely to yield the quickest and greatest payoff – invest most of you’re resources in these areas. It is also important to look at the long term learning issues that your organization needs to address.

3. Empower your work force to take risks in the market by decentralizing decision making – particularly encourage those in areas of key knowledge. As I have written in previous posts now is the time to wholeheartedly adopt transformational leadership practices in day to day operations and as a management policy.

Note: Many empowerment programs in Asian operations of international organizations run in to problems because of cultural attitudes (and beliefs) related to power and responsibility, be careful in implementing this option!

4. Set up a system of on job training, job rotation, provide incentives and support for personal development – initiate a PD (personal development) discussion process. PD discussions need to be taken seriously with personal targets set and behavior changes measured and rewarded.

The only way to improve is to learn and continuous learning is not a perhaps or maybe… today more than ever its an imperative!

**Link for direct page viewers return to main career success blog to check out other posts!

If you aren’t lucky enough to be working for a learning organization and need a change it may be time to update your resume so when you’ve finished the article take a look at the free blank resume form!

To continue…

5. Form learning partnerships with suppliers, distributors, and customers – set up feedback mechanisms such as focus groups, R&D joint ventures and customer survey mechanisms. Remember your organization can learn as much if not more from complaints as it can from compliments. Be sure that bad news is seen as an opportunity to improve and learn not only as a reason to discipline someone.

6. Have all positions applied for and include outsiders in our recruitment drive – only appoint the best in their field and avoid the all to familiar ‘best of a bad bunch’ in times of competence shortages. Promotion from within only should be a dead policy.

7. Benchmark your culture against other entrepreneurial firms – seek ways to understand key success factors for the market leaders in our field and study the oppositions’ successes. This is an area that seems to most difficult for many companies so a project team needs to address this as a serious and essential activity.

8. Set up a readily accessible knowledge bank and ‘experience’ network of mentors, gurus and experts in their field. Make sure the knowledge accumulated by expert staff doesn’t walk out the door with your retirees. With the “same old same old” mistakes made by bankers as evidenced by the recent meltdown shows that this industry particularly do not take learning and knowledge retention seriously.

9. Celebrate and recognize attempts to learn by employees who take a market risk and publicize within our organization by initiating fast real world feedback mechanisms. With today’s communication technology this is easier than ever however, someone still needs to initiate the action.

The nine steps for setting up a learning organization can at least give a good starting point for you to create a true learning organization however, it will take great effort and enormous commitment.

TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP part TWO: A TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADER’S CHARACTERISTICS

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

Six central personality characteristics of transformational leaders seem to emerge from the prolific literature on this topic.

Creative

Hackman and Johnson (1991) state that creativity is “challenging the status quo by seeking out new ideas…” Managers typically concern themselves with status quo maintenance, but leaders move beyond status quo to face and deal with the future. Transformation requires innovation and fresh perspectives to enduring questions. Many managers I deal with think that they will never become leaders because they don’t see themselves as being creative. Remember creative thinking can be taught and creative thinkers can hired and good leaders can effectively use the creativity of those around them… if the have the wisdom to listen.

Interactive

Hackman and Johnson (1991) also suggest that an interactive leader provides better direction than a non-interactive leader. In order to meet the needs of the follower, the leader must take a posture of open participation with follower. They also contend ‘that interaction is central to putting leadership into motion’. Many other theories (and practical experiences) of leadership emphasize the need for (effective) communication in order to attain success. Remember though communication is not interaction its merely the conduit between individuals. The important issues are found in dictionary definitions… “acting in close relation with each other” or “affecting each others behaviour”.

ARE WE CREATING TOMORROW OR BANKING ON THE PAST?

Empowering

Empowerment is fourth aspect that Hackman and Johnson (1991) suggest is important. Empowerment is the ability to “translate intention into reality and sustain it [for the followers]” (Bennis & Nanus, 1985). B & N further explain that ‘empowerment is the reciprocal of power and that empowerment puts duality into motion’. In other words, power translates into empowerment and empowerment, in turn, creates more power. Without leaders promoting responsibility and displacing power, followers cannot fully achieve their potential. This as we know is a big challenge in some Asian cultures. The key is if you want to have a modern successful organization, you as a leader must address this issue.

Visionary

Perhaps the most elemental characteristic of the transformational leader, “more than anything else, transformational leaders communicate a vision to their followers” (Hackman & Johnson, 1991). Zorn (1991) notes that vision helps to rally action toward achievement of the goal. Leaders must not only speak the vision, they must also enact the vision for individuals and the organization. Vision sets the direction and it is impossible to get where you want to be without direction. Can you or you staff quote your company’s vision, (or your own for that matter). So much has been said about vision and its central role in business and success, any more here would be superfluous.

A VISION WITH POWER CAN CHANGE MEDIOCRITY INTO EXCELLENCE

Passionate

‘Transformational leaders are passionate in their commitment to task and people alike’ (H & J, 1991). Bennis and Nanus (1985) again elaborate, “like explorer and artists, [leaders] seem to focus their attention on a limited field – their task – to forget personal problems, to loose their sense of time, to feel competent and in control”. To transform leaders must have a strong commitment to their vision. Passion is essential for this strong commitment, without passion there is no real direction and vision is short-lived.

Ethical

One final notable characteristic is that of high ethical standards. Any discussion of transformational leadership must include ethics. Burns (1978) comments, “Leaders must effectively ‘connect with’ followers from a level of morality only one stage higher than that of the followers, but moral leaders who act at much higher levels relate to followers at all levels…” Blanchard and Peale (1989) suggest that a manager with strong ethical standards is armed with the ability to do the right thing all of the time. They further conclude that ethics must not only be the result, but ethics must be involved in the process of decision making. An effective leader must be committed to ethical responses to any situation.

ETHICAL BANKERS, ACCOUNTANTS, LAWYERS, CORPORATE EXECUTIVES AND POLITICIANS… NOW THERE’S AN IDEA!

Refs: Hackman, M. & Johnson, C. (1991) Leadership. Waveland Press.
Zorn T E (1991). Construct system development, transformational leadership and leadership messages. Sthn Communication Jrnl, 56 (3), 178-193. Journal of Leadership Studies in 1995

Ric (orglearn) **Link for direct page viewers return to main career success blog to check out other posts!

While you’re here take a look at the free blank resume form!

SUMMARY

Transformational leadership assumes that people will energetically follow an individual who has the ability to inspire them and who can use others natural motivation to strive towards a shared vision. A person to be a true motivational leader must in addition to having worthwhile vision show a willingness to excel and the competence do great things in a creative new way. Transformational leadership to be successful assumes that agreed tasks can be accomplished by injecting commitment and enthusiasm among the followers.

Transformational leadership adjectives: articulate, uplifting, passionate, caring, trustworthy, integrity listening, committed, serving, influencing, encouraging, charismatic, creative, innovative, empowering and confident.

Transformational leaders set an example and become a role model for their followers. Transformational leaders see their followers as individuals and treat them as such.

In light of recent events transformational leadership’s capacity to reshape social and physical relationships is more needed than ever. Perhaps it is time to destroy old way of living and make way for new one. Finally transformational leadership encourages people to surpass their current levels of achievement and embrace a dynamic and innovative way to approach our future at a personal, organizational and political level. The world currently seems to be crying out for true leadership, transformational leadership, at all levels of society.

One more time:

INSPIRING AND ETHICAL BANKERS, ACCOUNTANTS, LAWYERS, CORPORATE EXECUTIVES, BUSINESS LEADERS AND POLITICIANS… NOW THERE REALLY IS A TRANSFORMATIONAL IDEA!

TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP part ONE: WHY EMBRACE “TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP”

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

To better understand why transformational leadership is a concept we should consider, a look at more traditional approaches is at first appropriate. Autocratic, army or public service style ‘instructional’ leadership encompasses hierarchies and the top-down use of power. This type of leader is supposed to know the best way to administer the business, conveys instructions to the subordinates then gets busy monitoring the work. The main problem with this form of leadership is that good administrators aren’t always great operators, nor can they keep up with real-world business trends, technological advances or more importantly the current rapid rate of changing customer preferences, (or social trends) and loyalties.

Another major difficulty with this style of leadership occurs as it concentrates on the growth and safety of business processes, with the development of followers, often becoming a secondary or even a non-priority. Modern business requires ‘the team’ to be “the servants of a collective vision”, thus leaders must fulfil the role of coach, cheerleader, supporter, problem solver and resource finder. Autocratic ‘instructional’ leadership, has therefore, as many correctly argue, outlived its usefulness.

Another form of traditional leadership is ‘transactional’ leadership. Transactional leadership (or bartering) is based on an exchange of services from staff for various kinds of rewards such as a salary & benefits. ‘Leithwood’ (1992) says this type of leadership “doesn’t stimulate improvement”. Mitchell and Tucker (Leadership Way of Thinking) add that ‘transactional leadership works only when both leaders and followers understand and are in agreement about which tasks are important’. Experience suggests that it is not often that staff and management, (even departments, sales vs. production, R&D vs. financial control etc.), truly agree on what is, or is not, important. It is arguable therefore that this form of leadership is also ready for the waste bin.

Ref and Adapted in part from ED347636 Aug 92 Transformational Leadership. ERIC Digest, Number 72. Author: Liontos, Lynn Balster

By the way if you want to see some other articles follow the link for direct page viewers return to main career success blog to check out other posts! While you’re here take a look at the free blank resume form!


Back to the topic…

WHAT IS TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP?

The idea of transformational leadership was first developed by James McGregor Burns in 1978 and later extended by Bernard Bass as well as others. Burns and Bass studied political leaders, army officers and business executives. An article in a 1995 issue of the Journal of Leadership Studies states, “Perhaps the most central notion of the transformational leader is the explicit purpose behind leading others. A transforming leader ACTS TO MAXIMISE THE NEEDS OF THE FOLLOWER. Leadership must also stimulate the needs of the entire organization of people constantly moving them to higher order needs. The term ‘transformational’ stems from the leaders ability to develop people as resources (should be potentials) and move them to a more satisfactory state of existence. Burns contrasts the transforming leader with a power wielder (transactional leader) suggesting that the transformational leader has an interest in the personal development of the follower, “leaders can also shape and alter and elevate the motives and values and goals of followers…” To Burns, transactional leadership is immature because it is based on the needs of the leader rather than the follower, “The object [in transactional leadership] is not a joint effort for persons with common aims acting for the collective interests of followers but a bargain to aid the individual interests of persons or groups going their separate ways”. Bass and Avolio (1989) argue that the transformational leader motivates followers (should be uses followers motivation) to act in the interest of the organization rather than to maximize self-interest.

Ric (orglearn – transformational leadership)

HOW TO WRECK YOUR ORGANIZATION; ALLOW THE EMPLOYEES ACT AS A GROUP RATHER THAN A TEAM

Monday, January 4th, 2010

Group (G-) versus Team (T-) Characteristics

G- Usually managed by an all-powerful unquestioned strong willed formal leader
T- Leadership is shared and rotated in accordance with expertise and required outcomes

G- Individual accountability for results (particularly mistakes), responsible for self-alone
T- Members are accountable to each other and responsible for all individuals

G- Individual’s primary motivation is to please those in power (usually by sucking up)
T- Team vision drives a desire to satisfy the recipient of team’s output, the customer

G- Individual work projects are encouraged and the basis for reward
T- Collective work projects to cope with modern complexities and maximise potential

G- Efficiency takes priority over effectiveness, ‘what a good little employee, working late’
T- Effectiveness priority, collective work, on budget, on time and the best customer solution

G- Effectiveness is judged purely by output of the individual’s limited area of responsibility
T- Effectiveness is judged by the team members ability to contribute to team synergy (1+1>2)

G- Work tasks tend to be delegated (or abdicated) to individuals that are ‘controlled’
T- Participative meetings and shared work and adult cooperation are the norm

G- A group really only crystallizes at critical moments for particular selfish endeavours
T- A team will be working to a plan and continually function until the mission is completed

G- Focus is on maintaining relationships and only doing enough tasks to remain accepted
T- Focus is on a shared vision driving tasks and where relationships are ‘properly’ managed

SO WHY DO PEOPLE JOIN (AND ENCOURAGE) GROUPS? REASONS LESSER PEOPLE FORM GROUPS (G-) AND AVOID TEAMS (T-)

G- Being part of a group can mistakenly lead us to the belief that membership will provide ‘defensive security’ and help us through the feeling that we are not alone (“misery enjoys company”)
T- Security is correctly based on expertise and proving our worth through competence, commitment and contribution

G- Opportunity for status and becoming ‘important’ through recognition based on association with those perceived as powerful or ‘in’
T- Status is based on respect and recognition of the individual’s perspective, competence and contributions to the wellbeing of all

G- Increased self-esteem and confirmation of self worth through association with the powerful, self worth only through others verification
T- Self-esteem and satisfaction through positive achievements brought about through continuous effort and belief in oneself

G- Affiliation is a basic need, even the most inept individuals crave some social acceptance, regardless of the personal cost
T- Inclusion only occurs if we are able and needed to improve the team’s outcomes and each member’s individual results

G- Our need for power/strength (found in numbers) or at least NOT wanting to feel or be powerless
T- Need to accept being empowered to accept responsibility based on expertise and the resultant earned trust

G- Help with personal goals through a pool of individuals often at the cost of our integrity
T- Personal goals only achieved through alignment with team goals and freedom built on mutual respect

SOME NASTY GROUP BEHAVIOURS THAT LIMIT SUCCESS

• Conformity is the basis for membership (demanded) to ensure acceptance, particularly by the powerful, which also destroys creativity, diversity and progress
• Status based on inequitable favouritism which breeds discontent with those on the ‘outer’ and leads to overly compliant behaviour
• Unimportant or peripheral behaviours become norms, ‘that’s the way we do things here’
• Personal credit is highly prized (and sometimes stolen), which often hides the real talent and diminishes any chance of building on shared ideas
• Role-playing in line with a set of expected behaviour patterns, which means plenty of form with minimal/no substance
• Social loafing where members don’t work as hard in the group as when alone, e.g. useless meetings (talk fests)
• The ‘mushroom principal’ flourishes, where members only pass on good news or what the powerful want to hear
• ‘Sucker effect’, hard workers feel as if they are suckers and the rest are having a relatively free ride
• Free-riding by capitalizing on the group’s willingness to suffer shortcomings because of loyalty
• Mooching off of group where the weak are able to suck from the strong in return for adoration
• Little or no effort to achieve a result, just do the minimum to stay out of trouble and in favour
• Importance of identifiably with the group subjugates competence as a success factor
• Groupthink means undesirable emotion based decisions rather than those based on intellect

KILL THE GROUP AND FORM SOME TEAMS

No teamwork at your place perhaps it time to move on… take a look at the free blank resume form!

MORE NASTY GROUP BEHAVIOURS THAT LIMIT A COMPANY’S SUCCESS

I guess the biggest problem with groups is that they inevitably succumb to the evils of ‘groupthink’. Groupthink leads to an illusion of invulnerability, rationalization of all opposing points of view (and unproductive behaviour), a belief in the group’s inherent morality, a stereotyped view of ‘the enemy’, direct pressure to conform, self-censorship (don’t speak the truth), the illusion of unanimity and the emergence of self-appointed ‘mind guards’.

The overwhelming need for agreement with the group position can be so strong that it outweighs a rational look at all of the evidence needed to allow ‘fair-mindedness’ i.e. rational behaviour versus a primarily emotional approach. Loyalty or desire to lead or to follow is paramount, non-disclosure, the tendency to ‘play your cards’ close to your chest destroys the requirement to be truly open and initiative and high energy towards leading (even enjoying) today’s rapid change is stifled by a desire or belief in not needing change in order to make good decisions.

Finally groups can quickly become gangs and indulge in gang behaviour and the associated bullying. According to the experts, gangs, diffuse role definition, have limited cohesion, foster impermanence, have minimal real consensus of norms, have shifting membership, often suffer from disturbed leadership and provide a limited definition of membership expectations.

NO WAY TO RUN A BUSINESS YOU SAY… IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME!

Refs:
http://users.ipfw.edu/bordens/social/group.htm
http://www.the-idler.com/IDLER-01/12-20.html
refs:http://rock.uwc.edu/psych/psy330/outlines/groups.htm

Ric (orglearn) **Link for direct page viewers return to main career success blog to check out other posts!

Have a quick think about your organization, do your project ‘teams’ or departments really operate as teams or are they merely less than effective, riddled with politics ineffective groups?!

Leadership: A Conductors Perspective

Friday, December 11th, 2009

A great leadership video that is also wonderful to watch.

If you can’t learn a lot from this, best not consider leadership as your role.

Ric (orglearn) **Link for direct page viewers return to main career success blog to check out other posts!

While you’re here take a look at the free blank resume form and perhaps you should, if seeking a leadership position, include the word conductor in your resume!

Leadership: Secrets of Becoming a Great Leader

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Leadership is about inspiring others to follow:

Old style leadership anagram

Despotic Anagram (old thinking)

Dictatorial & commanding
Evaluates rather than values
Suspicious and cynical
Power seeking & taking
Oppresses differences
Total control seeker
Intrustive & instructive
Cold and calculating

Nothing too inspiring about despots!

“THE WORLD THAT WE HAVE MADE AS A RESULT OF THE LEVEL OF THINKING WE HAVE DONE THUS FAR CREATES PROBLEMS THAT WE CANNOT SOLVE AT THE SAME LEVEL AT WHICH WE CREATED THEM” – Albert Einstein

So what we need is great teams leveraging on each others ideas and talents inspired by great leaders.

Leadership Anagram (new thinking)

Love of followers is demonstrated
Empathetic with individuals at all levels
Able to create vision & achieve the mission
Democratic decisions & communicates
Empowers & encourages others
Resilient, overcomes setbacks
Sharing, provides for followers needs
Hopeful, positive & future driven
Intelligent, uses the head and heart
Persistent, sticks to the task, never gives up

SO WHICH ONE IS MORE LIKE YOU? – (ACCORDING TO THE STAFF?)

The short wall sign you should put up in your office if you want to learn the formula to becoming a great leader!

A personal oath you can make to yourself if you want to become a great leader:

I will take a long term view, conceive and communicate a well thought out and positive vision that is tested and supported by an appropriate set of values

I will always be innovative and take care to effectively decide what is important and what is just clutter and I will actively promote that which is important.

I will readily elicit and accept help and will stay close and constantly listen to and consider the suggestions made by my key players.

I will strive with passion to build a team (rather than a group) where reward is linked to outcomes and continuous learning is the norm.

I will take care to see, recognize and celebrate the best that followers contribute and allow others to shine and share in the spotlight.

I will actively remember that now is the only time we ever have will always live in the present

I will ungrudgingly be willing to make personal sacrifices to actively ensure the best outcomes for my followers.

So do you really want a leadership role?

**Link for direct page viewers return to main career success blog to check out other posts!

While you’re here take a look at the free blank resume form!

Leadership takes competence and confidence so remember:  “The most important words you will ever hear are those that you say to yourself about yourself when you are by yourself.” source unkown.

Ric (orglearn)

Career Advice from Buffet and Gates

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

This CNBC video of a town hall meeting at Columbia University with Bill Gates and Warren Buffet is a valuable resource for all of us and particularly those looking for some sound career and business advice.

Some of the assets we need as individuals seeking success:

Gates: ‘continuing to learn from those that live the topic’
Buffet: ‘developing our communication skills’

What Buffet admires about Gates: His charity to others and his commitment of energy, skill and money
What Gates admires about Buffet: His integrity and willingness to share his knowledge and experience


This is a must watch video for any aspiring and positive human being looking for something to form the pillars of their career.

Ric (orglearn) **Link for direct page viewers return to main career success blog to check out other posts!

While you’re here take a look at the free blank resume form then do your resume and perhaps you can ensure that it contains and communicates examples of how you represent a person of integrity, passion, charity with a willingness to be a continuous learner!